Monday, January 16, 2017

CONCLUSIONS



                                                                                                                                                             

This survey of the members of the Gutiérrez-Magee Expedition investigated 117 non-native Mexican participants in the 1812-13 filibuster identified through various sources as active in the expedition (see Table 1, following page). Depending on the widely-varying figures of how many actually took part, this number represents 15-25 percent of the total. The sources from which these names are drawn are not the muster rolls (long since lost), but rather letters, diary entries, affidavits, and family histories. The nature of such sources skews the sample slightly towards officers: colonels, majors and captains; though there are, clearly, a number of enlisted soldiers within the survey.[1]
In age, expedition participants were as young as 12 (Peter Boone) and as old as 58 (Benjamin Allen). Most, however, were in their twenties and thirties. In addition to the Allen family, there were several groups of relatives who fought together. Warren D.C. Hall, who would later play a significant role in the Republic of Texas, fought alongside his brother John “Jack” Hall and possible relative Darlington Hall. In terms of wealth, those who we know appear to be diverse. A few, such as Reuben Ross and Joseph Carr were identified as men of distinction, although wealth on the frontier could be fleeting and Ross found himself nearly bankrupt by 1828, and died trying to validate his claims in Mexico. Many were poor or middle-class farmers like Edmund Quirk, Aylett Buckner, or Henry Munson who were seeking new lands for cultivation and possibly speculation, or insecure frontier professionals like David Phelps. Some were men with elite pretensions like Henry Adams Bullard, Darius Johnston, and Orramel Johnston who saw a path to distinction and respect through military glory.
                                           Table 1: Known or Suspected Participants                  
Samuel Alden
Martin Allen
Hiram Allen
Benjamin Allen
David Allen
John Ash
Samuel Barber
Stephen Barker
Carlos (Charles) Beltran
Jose Benitis
Horatio Bigelow
Peter Boone
Matthew Bonnette
Aylette C. Buckner
Henry Adams Bullard
John G. Burnett
Evariste Calvettes
Joseph Carr
? Caston
Andrew Chase
Michael Chesneu
Joshua Child(s)
Nathaniel Cogswell
Albert Cole
Colonie
Hamlin Cook
Godwin Brown Cotton
Henry Derbonne
Bernardo Despallier
? Deen
George M. Dick
Peter Dillon
Peter Dolet
Bernardo D’Ortolan
Anthony Dubois
Eoses
William Fisher
Dr. Samuel D. Forsyth(e)
Isaac Foster
William Francis
James Gaines
? Gemaile
Pierre “Pedro” Girard
? Gormley or Gromby
Alexis Grappe
Nathan M. Hale
Darlington Hall
John “Jack” W. Hall
Warren D.C. Hall
Eli Harris
Charles A. Hickman
? Holmes
Darius Johnston
Orramel Johnston
Samuel Kemper
Joseph Pulaski Kennedy
John Gladden King
Amalie Lafitte
Bernard Lafitte
Abner Lane
Louis Lathum
Arsine Latour
David Long
Thomas Luckett
Augustus Magee
Dan MacLean
Louis Massicott
A.W. McClain
John McLannahan
Daniel McClean
John McFarland
James McKim
William McLane
? Menepier
Tenoss Moinet
Aaron Samuel Mower
Henry William Munson
William B. Murray
Samuel Noah
H.I. Offeet
George Orr
William Owen(s)
William Parker
Anthony Parish (Pared)
James Patterson
Henry Perry
David Phelps
W. Phierson
Juan Pincornel
William A. Prentiss
? Prudhomme
Edmund Quirk
Elisha Roberts
Andrew Robinson
Reuben Ross
James Royall
Charles Rollins
? Rollins
Joseph Ruth
? Scott
Samuel Sexton
Peter Sides
Thomas Slocum
William Slocum
Reuben Smith
William Snodgrass
Josiah Taylor
Thomas Taylor
Chesneau Tontin
John Villars
W.W. Walker
Stephen Wallace
George Westfield
James Biddle Wilkinson
Joseph Biddle Wilkinson
? Wolforth
Walter Young





Geographically, they came from across the nation. There were New Englanders like Augustus Magee, Henry Adams Bullard, Henry Perry, and Nathaniel Cogswell; New Yorkers like Walter Young; Pennsylvanians like Samuel Alden, George Orr, and William McLane; Georgians like the Allen family, Marylanders like William Parker; and Mississippians like Joseph Carr. This diversity is notable, but deceptive. With the exception of Toledo’s group formed in Philadelphia, almost all participants identified by region came through the West, having immigrated to Kentucky, Tennessee, Missouri, Mississippi, or Louisiana in the years before joining the expedition, and likely absorbed the frontier ethos in their adopted homes. Thus, Darius and Orramel Johnston are born New Englanders (from Connecticut), but their family moved west and they (and their much younger half-brother Albert Sydney) were raised in Kentucky. Samuel Kemper’s family moved from the Virginia backcountry progressively west as the population followed them. They settled first in Ohio, then Kentucky and finally Mississippi. A small number of participants were native Westerners like George Westfield, who was born in Kentucky (see Table 2, following page).
The men of the Gutiérrez-Magee Expedition were the products of the migration described in the introduction, made up primarily of the democratic elements of the southern and middle states, formed into a new western nation-within-a-nation that was unified economically and culturally by the north-south highway of the Mississippi River and its tributaries. This region’s interests pointed west and south along the great river, in opposition to the coastal states, which still dominated them politically. This relationship would change in time, particularly as the Southwest became integrated into the South’s cotton culture, but the year 1812 was a hinge moment in American history, before which
nationalism was still embryonic, and sectionalism existed along a more of a horizontal, rather than vertical axis. For westerners, the prime driver in everything that they did was the desire for land. It was why they had left the original 13 states to begin with. Annual sales of western land rose from 100,000 acres in the 1790s to over 500,000 after 1800.
                         Table 2: Geographic Origin of the Participants       
Name
Born in
           Resided in 1812
Samuel Alden
Pennsylvania

Martin Allen

Campbell County, Kentucky
Hiram Allen

Campbell County, Kentucky
Benjamin Allen
Wilkes County, Georgia
Campbell County, Kentucky
David Allen

Campbell County, Kentucky
Samuel Barber
Virginia
Louisiana
Carlos Beltran
Wheeling, Virginia
Ohio
Horatio Bigelow

Pennsylvania
Peter Boone

San Antonio, Texas
Aylette C. Buckner
Louisa County, Virginia
(Possibly) Kentucky
Henry Adams Bullard
Pepperell, Mass
Philadelphia
Joseph Carr
Woodville, Mississippi

? Caston
Mississippi

Nathaniel Cogswell
Haverhill, Massachusetts
Philadelphia
Godwin Brown Cotton

Philadelphia
Bernardo Despallier
Louisiana
Texas
? Deen
Mississippi

Bernardo D’Ortolan
Louisiana
Texas
William Francis

Louisiana
James Gaines
Culpeper County, Virginia
Louisiana
Darlington Hall
Fairfield County, South Carolina

Warren D.C. Hall
North Carolina

Darius Johnston
Connecticut
Kentucky
Orramel Johnston
Connecticut
Kentucky
Samuel Kemper
Fauquier County, Virginia
Louisiana
Joseph Pulaski Kennedy

Mississippi
Thomas Luckett
Virginia

Augustus Magee
Massachusetts
Louisiana
A.W. McClain
North Carolina

John McLannahan

Missouri
James McKim
North Carolina
Louisiana
William McLane
Pennsylvania
Louisiana
Henry William Munson
Volla Gayoso, Mississippi

George Orr
Pennsylvania

William Owen(s)
Baltimore
Natchitoches, Louisiana
Henry Perry
Newtown, Connecticut

David Phelps
Hebron, Connecticut

? Prudhomme
Louisiana
Louisiana
Edmund Quirk
Virginia
Kentucky
Reuben Ross

Missouri
Peter Sides
North Carolina
Tennessee
Reuben Smith

Missouri
William Snodgrass

Mississippi
Josiah Taylor

Natchitoches, Louisiana
George Westfield
Kentucky
Kentucky
James Biddle Wilkinson
Pennsylvania
Kentucky
Joseph Biddle Wilkinson
Kentucky
Kentucky
Walter Young
New York

Land was a status symbol; Joyce Appleby notes that ownership of real estate put a settler on “the right side of the critical divide between independence and dependency, probably the most salient of all social markers in an America that was still preponderantly rural.”[2] This desire for land predated the nation, and burst forth after the revolution as British restraints on westward migration were moved. It would grow to a flood before 1812 and a torrent afterwards. Western land was desirable, and its costs were increasing proportionately. On the other hand, land in Mexico, even under the Spanish, was available for a nominal fee. Although as we have seen, the expedition’s members were very diverse, Gutiérrez’ offer of free land was certainly the prime motivation for most recruits, because land was the universal currency of the frontier. And it was so by design: as the Mexican revolutionary agent had traveled throughout the West in 1811, Gutiérrez had observed and spoken with many westerners, and this land hunger would have been the most outstanding facet of frontier society, as we saw in the early accounts in the introduction. Gutiérrez also added other inducements – the right to capture and sell livestock and work mines, which may have sweetened the deal for some participants, but those were illusory goals; land was real. Joseph Carr’s promissory note proving his claim to a league of land would have been among the former soldier’s most prized possessions, and most participants would have felt the same way. The fact that so many survivors did eventually return to Texas indicates that the desire to settle was strong.


[1] While approximately 130 Americans entered Texas at the beginning of the expedition, the numbers swelled with success and may have reached nearly 800. There are additional names that were not included because the connection to the expedition could be investigated and proven to be spurious. For instance, Juan Davis Bradburn, who became infamous as a pro-Mexican foil for Anglo settlers in the 1830s, has been tied to the expedition on purely speculative grounds. Additionally, non-military personnel and Spanish citizens who joined from within Texas are not included in this list. The purpose is to encompass “outsiders” as the Spanish regime would have defined them.
[2] Appleby, 138.

No comments:

Post a Comment